toolbar

Monday, December 27, 2010

Sunday, December 26, 2010

ADMIT CARD AIPGMEE 2011

link to admit card AIPGMEE 2011

use internet explorer 6 and above

http://202.144.108.151/AIPGMEE-MDMS-HALLTICKET-2011/

click here

Friday, December 17, 2010

Request Softwares,books, anything!!!!

If you need any software ,book, video ....anything just mail me at

pkp1430@yahoo.com

Pulmonary Auscultation software

Its the very very best software and my fav.  too.

for this you have to download torrent client like utorrent and then click here to download the torrent file and it will start downloading automatically...


share this with frnds if you like!!!!


ug4pg team

mail me at-pkp1430@yahoo.com

cardiac auscultation software

Having problem understanding heart sounds, Murmur, S1,S2,S3,S4...????


ug4pg now presents a very good software for understanding it..


just click here

4shared

mediafire




mail me at-pkp1430@yahoo.com

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Common Entrance Test 2011-2012 The Hindu 14-nov.2010

The Hindu 14-nov.2010


MCI can notify rule but no court approval for CET, for now
J. Venkatesan

Pendency no bar to anyone challenging regulation after notification: Bench
CET issue can't be decided on petition by some students: Tamil Nadu

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday made it clear to the Medical Council of India that it could not grant approval for the proposal to introduce a common nationwide eligibility-cum-entrance test for MBBS and postgraduate courses from 2011-12 even before the regulations 
were notified.

A Bench of Justices R.V. Raveendran and A.K. Patnaik, in a brief order, said the pendency of the matter in the court would not, however, come in the way of the MCI notifying any rule in accordance with law if it had been approved by the Centre. 

Nor would the pendency stand in the way of anyone (affected party) challenging the validity of the regulation after it was notified.

Appearing for the MCI, senior counsel Amarendra Saran said a national eligibility-cum-entrance test would ensure transparency and prevent irregularities in admissions.

At this, Justice Raveendran said: “You want this court to give the seal of approval for a regulation which is not notified. The scheme has to come, it has to be challenged, we will have to hear the States and other parties and go into its validity and then decide whether the rule is valid or not. 

How can we grant approval for a regulation which is yet to be notified? You notify the rule, we will consider if it is challenged.”

Senior counsel Ashok Desai, appearing for Tamil Nadu said the State had already enacted a law abolishing the Common Entrance Test and the issue of CET could not be decided on a petition filed by some students.

Counsel A.D.N. Rao, appearing for the main petitioners Simran Jain and others, said many States had already opposed the move to have a CET. He, however, said the common test would help students.

The D.D. Medical and Educational Trust, represented by its chairman and managing trustee T.D. Naidu; the Christian Medical College, Vellore, and some other colleges had filed intervention applications. 

The Bench said it would be open to them to challenge the notification, once it was issued, if they were aggrieved.